I like your style Ms French. You smashed it :). If the IRS was producing vaccinations T. Paine would be pushing them hard no matter how many people were dropping dead around him.
Y’all truly ingenious. I mean really brilliant people here, top notch thinkers.
I have two rules: #1 I don’t fly third world airlines unless it’s a matter of life and death. And #2 I don’t participate in medical experiments.
How many shots did you gullible people take? I mean you have to be next level gullible to take legal and tax advice from a felon convicted of tax evasion. I guess you believed all the sycophants pushing the experimental gene therapy and now that you realize you were duped you feel the need to lash out.
$50k in tax penalties later... nah. No common sense, so unlikely that y’all will ever realize that you’re just simply wrong. Good luck with all that! And have a lovely weekend.
Lol you’ll care when those chickens come home to roost. Choices have consequences. When y’all get charged with criminal tax evasion and sentenced to federal prison you’ll cry like a little girl about how unfair life is. And my life is already fun, thanks!
"In the trial proceedings the government was faced with an apparently unexpected challenge to produce documentation of non-existent but required properly-completed approval paperwork for the asserted FRPs. Unwilling to simply drop the penalties, the government instead produced fake approval forms.
Happily, the faked documents were detected and exposed. Not so happily, the tax court judge hearing the case refused to take notice of the fact that the government had produced (and was relying upon) fraudulent evidence, ruling in the government's favor anyway."
...
"Declarations were made under oath in filings in a 2011 lawsuit, Waltner v. Comm'r, US Tax Court #8726-11 L, that the fake signatures are those of various personnel at the tax agency and constitute "evidence" that seizures of property from Steve and Sarah Waltner had been authorized as required by law. The government's apparent need to contrive false documents strongly suggests that what was being "proven" is not true.
BUT AS DISTURBING AS THESE APPARENT FORGERIES ARE ON THEIR OWN, there's a larger and darker picture here. The overall evidence suggests the questionable documents were made because the government's inability to produce real ones in this case threatened to expose an underlying fraud, by which a larger number of Americans have been victimized over the course of at least seven years."
...
"In the penalty scheme, $5,000 penalties are threatened, and sometimes even seized in response to returns the IRS doesn't like. Both had happened to the Waltners, who were subjected to a number of threats, as well as a diversion of money from a complete refund for 2009 against an alleged penalty for a different filing.
The problem with the scheme is that the legitimate imposition of "frivolous return" penalties is statutorily-controlled. Such penalties can only be legally imposed if a return is based on a "frivolous position" identified by the Secretary of the Treasury on a list he is required to produce and publish for this purpose, as specified in section 6702(c) of Title 26 of the US Code.
The "fine-print" filings are perfectly legitimate. There is no "position" appearing on the Secretary's list by which they can qualify for the penalties.
Faced with the conundrum of very much wanting to discourage these inconvenient filings, but unable to do so legitimately, the IRS contrived a "workaround". The agency created a fake list of "positions".
The fake list contains versions of all of the actual "positions" found on the legitimate list produced by the Secretary of the Treasury, but features one unique agency addition, labeled "Argument 44". While purportedly a "position" (or "argument") on which a filing could be based (as is true of all the legitimate listed positions, and as is required for any listed item to serve its statutorily-specified purpose), Argument 44 is actually just a description of a typical "fine-print" filing.
Further, there is actually a real Argument 44 on the real list. The real Argument 44, the existence of which emphasizes the fraudulent character of citations to the fake one, bears not the slightest similarity or relationship to the one on the fake list."
...
"Steve and Sarah Waltner have been the first to knowledgeably challenge the assertion of these penalties, a challenge that prompted the apparent government attempt to cover-up with forgeries and perjury. The Department of Treasury, through its Office of Chief Counsel, the IRS, and the Tax Court judge in the Waltners' case, who, though put on notice of the questionable documents by the Waltners treated them as real and ruled against the Waltners in their suit, has hunkered down into a stonewall mode.
CLEARLY, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE have a great deal at stake in all this. If forgery and perjury have been deployed by government officials against citizens, this is far too much to tolerate.
Of even more potential significance is the prospect of fraudulent "frivolous return penalties" meant to be covered up by forgeries and perjury. More significant still would be that all of these other corrupt things are done in order to suppress the spread of accurate but government-disfavored information about the 800 lb. gorilla in American personal and political life known as the income tax.
Further, the big picture here could involve more and deeper corruption than just what is shown in this focused slice discussed above, from which the veil has fortuitously slipped. The evidence suggests that the rot might extend to the US Department of Justice and some federal district and circuit court judges, as well."
"The overall evidence suggests the questionable documents were made because the government's inability to produce real ones in this case threatened to expose an underlying fraud"
For those of you too naive to think the government and courts would do something so underhanded, maybe you were in a coma for the last four years.
I have over four hundred posts compiling the evidence showing the CIA's "disinformation program is complete" and everything you think you know is false:
I don’t see where there is any definitive evidence that the documents provided were forged as alleged by the Waltners. The only thing that document examiner determined was that the signatures were copies- you ever hear of a signature stamp?
The IRS is completely incompetent and slow as molasses because it’s run by a bunch of bureaucrats- I wouldn’t doubt at all they they might misplace stuff- but that doesn’t mean that tax evasion is excusable just because they’re incompetent. At the end of the day, you could have just paid your $11k in taxes due under the IRC, but instead you’re going to give the government $32k because you think you have the government by the balls, and you don’t. LOL and you will pay. All of these cases paid in the end. And if you don’t pay voluntarily, they’ll just take it from you.
Yeah, I deal with the IRS all the time LOL I know very well how they are. You only know how they are for you. I know how they are with lots and lots of people.
The last three years they have been very slow to act. But they're picking up again with those 87,000 agents and customer service reps. Can't wait to see what other notices you get. I suppose at some point I'll get to read your court case in Checkpoint. Dawn French et. al. vs Commissioner. I'm curious if you are planning on trying to find an attorney to help you?
"I deal with the IRS all the time ... You only know how they are for you."
I only know how the irs is for me? So you missed the part where I revealed I was enrolled:
Section 7701(a)(35) Enrolled actuary
"The term "enrolled actuary" means a person who is enrolled by the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries established under subtitle C of the title III of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974."
So your assertion here is incorrect.
And no, attorney's are not trustworthy in my opinion. Worse than accountants even.
I like your style Ms French. You smashed it :). If the IRS was producing vaccinations T. Paine would be pushing them hard no matter how many people were dropping dead around him.
Y’all truly ingenious. I mean really brilliant people here, top notch thinkers.
I have two rules: #1 I don’t fly third world airlines unless it’s a matter of life and death. And #2 I don’t participate in medical experiments.
How many shots did you gullible people take? I mean you have to be next level gullible to take legal and tax advice from a felon convicted of tax evasion. I guess you believed all the sycophants pushing the experimental gene therapy and now that you realize you were duped you feel the need to lash out.
$50k in tax penalties later... nah. No common sense, so unlikely that y’all will ever realize that you’re just simply wrong. Good luck with all that! And have a lovely weekend.
I couldn't care less about your rules or what you think Mr Paine. Have a fun life.
Lol you’ll care when those chickens come home to roost. Choices have consequences. When y’all get charged with criminal tax evasion and sentenced to federal prison you’ll cry like a little girl about how unfair life is. And my life is already fun, thanks!
Nice. Now your homework is to read Tax Court TC Memo 2014-35. It’s a little long, but worth it.
https://casetext.com/case/waltner-v-commr-1
I'm guessing you haven't seen this: https://losthorizons.com/FRP/FRPFraud.htm
"In the trial proceedings the government was faced with an apparently unexpected challenge to produce documentation of non-existent but required properly-completed approval paperwork for the asserted FRPs. Unwilling to simply drop the penalties, the government instead produced fake approval forms.
Happily, the faked documents were detected and exposed. Not so happily, the tax court judge hearing the case refused to take notice of the fact that the government had produced (and was relying upon) fraudulent evidence, ruling in the government's favor anyway."
...
"Declarations were made under oath in filings in a 2011 lawsuit, Waltner v. Comm'r, US Tax Court #8726-11 L, that the fake signatures are those of various personnel at the tax agency and constitute "evidence" that seizures of property from Steve and Sarah Waltner had been authorized as required by law. The government's apparent need to contrive false documents strongly suggests that what was being "proven" is not true.
BUT AS DISTURBING AS THESE APPARENT FORGERIES ARE ON THEIR OWN, there's a larger and darker picture here. The overall evidence suggests the questionable documents were made because the government's inability to produce real ones in this case threatened to expose an underlying fraud, by which a larger number of Americans have been victimized over the course of at least seven years."
...
"In the penalty scheme, $5,000 penalties are threatened, and sometimes even seized in response to returns the IRS doesn't like. Both had happened to the Waltners, who were subjected to a number of threats, as well as a diversion of money from a complete refund for 2009 against an alleged penalty for a different filing.
The problem with the scheme is that the legitimate imposition of "frivolous return" penalties is statutorily-controlled. Such penalties can only be legally imposed if a return is based on a "frivolous position" identified by the Secretary of the Treasury on a list he is required to produce and publish for this purpose, as specified in section 6702(c) of Title 26 of the US Code.
The "fine-print" filings are perfectly legitimate. There is no "position" appearing on the Secretary's list by which they can qualify for the penalties.
Faced with the conundrum of very much wanting to discourage these inconvenient filings, but unable to do so legitimately, the IRS contrived a "workaround". The agency created a fake list of "positions".
The fake list contains versions of all of the actual "positions" found on the legitimate list produced by the Secretary of the Treasury, but features one unique agency addition, labeled "Argument 44". While purportedly a "position" (or "argument") on which a filing could be based (as is true of all the legitimate listed positions, and as is required for any listed item to serve its statutorily-specified purpose), Argument 44 is actually just a description of a typical "fine-print" filing.
Further, there is actually a real Argument 44 on the real list. The real Argument 44, the existence of which emphasizes the fraudulent character of citations to the fake one, bears not the slightest similarity or relationship to the one on the fake list."
...
"Steve and Sarah Waltner have been the first to knowledgeably challenge the assertion of these penalties, a challenge that prompted the apparent government attempt to cover-up with forgeries and perjury. The Department of Treasury, through its Office of Chief Counsel, the IRS, and the Tax Court judge in the Waltners' case, who, though put on notice of the questionable documents by the Waltners treated them as real and ruled against the Waltners in their suit, has hunkered down into a stonewall mode.
CLEARLY, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE have a great deal at stake in all this. If forgery and perjury have been deployed by government officials against citizens, this is far too much to tolerate.
Of even more potential significance is the prospect of fraudulent "frivolous return penalties" meant to be covered up by forgeries and perjury. More significant still would be that all of these other corrupt things are done in order to suppress the spread of accurate but government-disfavored information about the 800 lb. gorilla in American personal and political life known as the income tax.
Further, the big picture here could involve more and deeper corruption than just what is shown in this focused slice discussed above, from which the veil has fortuitously slipped. The evidence suggests that the rot might extend to the US Department of Justice and some federal district and circuit court judges, as well."
"The overall evidence suggests the questionable documents were made because the government's inability to produce real ones in this case threatened to expose an underlying fraud"
For those of you too naive to think the government and courts would do something so underhanded, maybe you were in a coma for the last four years.
If you think, "they can't all be in on it!"
bitchute.com/video/javjF2xljAi7
And it just so happens that my other substack is replete with evidence of other court cases that were faked:
Salem Witch Trials were fake: https://open.substack.com/pub/theresearchofmilesmathis/p/salem-witches?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
The Hanging of John Brown was fake: https://open.substack.com/pub/theresearchofmilesmathis/p/john-brown?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
The O. J. Simpson Trial was Faked: https://open.substack.com/pub/theresearchofmilesmathis/p/oj-simpson?r=gse79&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
The Derek Chauvin Trial:
https://theresearchofmilesmathis.substack.com/p/george-floyd?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
The Menendez Brothers Trial: https://open.substack.com/pub/theresearchofmilesmathis/p/lyle-and-erik-menendez?r=gse79&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
The Larry Nassar Trial:
https://theresearchofmilesmathis.substack.com/p/larry-nassar-gymnastics-scandal?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
I have over four hundred posts compiling the evidence showing the CIA's "disinformation program is complete" and everything you think you know is false:
https://open.substack.com/pub/theresearchofmilesmathis/p/categories-of-content?r=gse79&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
I don’t see where there is any definitive evidence that the documents provided were forged as alleged by the Waltners. The only thing that document examiner determined was that the signatures were copies- you ever hear of a signature stamp?
The IRS is completely incompetent and slow as molasses because it’s run by a bunch of bureaucrats- I wouldn’t doubt at all they they might misplace stuff- but that doesn’t mean that tax evasion is excusable just because they’re incompetent. At the end of the day, you could have just paid your $11k in taxes due under the IRC, but instead you’re going to give the government $32k because you think you have the government by the balls, and you don’t. LOL and you will pay. All of these cases paid in the end. And if you don’t pay voluntarily, they’ll just take it from you.
"you could have just paid your $11k in taxes due under the IRC"
Except you and they have failed to show I have any taxes due.
"LOL and you will pay. All of these cases paid in the end. And if you don’t pay voluntarily, they’ll just take it from you."
There you have it folks, the licensed cpa doesn't know the code and is complicit in the fraud against you.
I think you are missing the point entirely that bureaucrats are EXACTLY what we are dealing with.
Yeah, I deal with the IRS all the time LOL I know very well how they are. You only know how they are for you. I know how they are with lots and lots of people.
The last three years they have been very slow to act. But they're picking up again with those 87,000 agents and customer service reps. Can't wait to see what other notices you get. I suppose at some point I'll get to read your court case in Checkpoint. Dawn French et. al. vs Commissioner. I'm curious if you are planning on trying to find an attorney to help you?
"I deal with the IRS all the time ... You only know how they are for you."
I only know how the irs is for me? So you missed the part where I revealed I was enrolled:
Section 7701(a)(35) Enrolled actuary
"The term "enrolled actuary" means a person who is enrolled by the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries established under subtitle C of the title III of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974."
So your assertion here is incorrect.
And no, attorney's are not trustworthy in my opinion. Worse than accountants even.
LOL so you crunched numbers for retirement plans. This should be gold. Can't wait to read your case in Checkpoint.
wow, already giving me homework to do!